Combined divisions - these are NOT official results.USPSA Match RIFLE
Match Date: 5/18/2007
PlaceNameUSPSAClassDivisionPFLadyForAgeMatch PtsMatch %Point Series
1Joyce, JimA8166UOpenMajorNoNo 542.4926100.000%
2Dowdle, JoshuaA56464UOpenMajorNoNo 519.698595.798%
3Lumsden, CurtisA49229UOpenMajorNoNo 480.414488.557%
4Steinle, MarkA16580BOpenMinorNoNo 460.182484.827%
5Brookshier, RandyA26862ULimitedMajorNoNo 434.312180.059%
6Stuard, AlvaA57997UProductionMinorNoNo 384.754370.923%
7McGonigal, SteveA53048UOpenMinorNoNo 381.368170.299%
8Sink, MichaelA49228UOpenMajorNoNo 375.223369.167%
9Jones, JayUOpenMajorNoNo 367.507967.744%
10Tilden, JohnA47228ULimitedMajorNoNo 339.692062.617%
11Frame, Roy A52580URevolverMajorNoNo 326.510860.187%
12Oneill, RandyA55441UOpenMinorNoNo 324.013059.727%
13Puruczky, RickA36979ULimitedMajorNoNo 318.425358.697%
14Gaylor, JohnA48882ULimited 10MajorNoNo 315.345458.129%
15Landis, GregULimitedMinorNoNo 303.410355.929%
16Finn, BudFY34563ULimited 10MajorNoNo 280.752551.752%
17Austin, ScottA52582USingle StackMajorNoNo 260.474448.014%
18Schenk, JohnA56211ULimited 10MajorNoNo 236.171643.535%
19Givens, RobA57795ULimited 10MajorNoNo 215.618539.746%
20Dickerson, VinceA37332ULimitedMinorNoNo 200.039036.874%
21Ellison, JamesULimitedMajorNoNo 176.081232.458%
22Martin, GaryA57058UOpenMinorNoNo 169.035731.159%
23Price, RobertA56179ULimited 10MajorNoNo 162.000029.862%
24Morton, TimUProductionMinorNoNo 136.822925.221%
25Noonkester, ScottUSingle StackMajorNoNo 124.681522.983%
26Greene, JohnULimited 10MinorNoNo 59.112610.896%
27Leray, SimonPenULimitedMajorNoNo 54.956910.130%
Number of Competitors:27
Printed:05/20/07 10:17 AMPage 2 of 2
Combined divisions - these are NOT official results. Odd things happen when comparing these Combined results to the By Division results. Sometimes the 'Order of Finsh' changes. Normaly this only occurs when two shooters have very similar scores in the By Division results. This is because a different High Hit factor was set for stages in the Combinded results. This is a normal occurance, but it takes more of a math whiz than me to explain.